“Lawpher – Making law simple, accessible, and fair.”

Support Email: shangzhikeji@gmail.com

SIEBERT v. ALABAMA, 497 U.S. 1032 (1990)

2025-10-18 unicorn 0 comments

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

SIEBERT v. ALABAMA , 497 U.S. 1032 (1990)

497 U.S. 1032

Danial SIEBERT, petitioner
v.
ALABAMA. No. 89-7528.

Case below, Ala.Cr.App., 555 So. 2d 772; 555 So. 2d 780.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 28, 1990. Denied.

Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting:

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 231, 2950, 2973 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.[ Siebert v. Alabama 497 U.S. 1032 (1990) ]



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

SIEBERT v. ALABAMA , 497 U.S. 1032 (1990)  497 U.S. 1032

Danial SIEBERT, petitioner
v.
ALABAMA. No. 89-7528.

Case below, Ala.Cr.App., 555 So. 2d 772; 555 So. 2d 780.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 28, 1990. Denied.

Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting:

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 231, 2950, 2973 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.[ Siebert v. Alabama 497 U.S. 1032 (1990) ]

Comments

Be the first to comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. * indicates required fields.

Top