District Court's judgment dismissing complaint challenging
constitutionality of certain provisions of Postal Revenue and
Federal Salary Act of 1967 and 1975 Executive Salary Cost-of-Living
Adjustment Act, is vacated, and case is remanded for further
consideration in light of intervening amendment to PRFSA.
428 F.
Supp. 302, vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of We the People for leave to file a brief, as
amicus curiae, is granted. The motion of James W.
Jeffords,
et al., for leave to file a brief, as
amici
curiae, is granted.
Appellant challenges the operation of certain provisions of the
Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act of 1967, 2 U.S.C. §§ 351-361,
and of the 1975 Executive Salary Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act, 2
U.S.C. § 31 (1970 ed., Supp. V), relating to increases in salaries
paid members of Congress. He asserts that the operation of these
Acts violates Art. I, § 1, and § 6, cl. 1 (the Ascertainment
Clause), of the Constitution.
On April 4, 1977, Congress passed an amendment to the Postal
Revenue and Federal Salary Act. On April 12, the President signed
that amendment into law. Pub.L. 95-19, 91 Stat. 45.
It appearing that the amendment to the Postal Revenue and
Federal Salary Act will alter materially the scope and perhaps the
nature of appellant's suit, the judgment of the District
Page 431 U. S. 170
Court is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for
further consideration in the light of the new legislation.
It is so ordered.
MR. JUSTICE STEVENS would affirm the judgment dismissing the
complaint.
Comments
Be the first to comment
Leave a Comment