“Lawpher – Making law simple, accessible, and fair.”

Support Email: shangzhikeji@gmail.com

NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)

2025-10-18 unicorn 0 comments

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)

4 U.S. 6 (Dall.)

The State of New York
v.
The State of Connecticut et al. *

August Term, 1799

AS the state of Connecticut did not appear, Hoffman moved that she should appear on the first day of next term, or that the plaintiff be then at liberty to proceed ex parte. 3 Dal. 335. But Lewis observed, that the rule required that a subpoena issuing in a suit in equity, should be served sixty days before the return; which had not been done in the present case. The first motion was, thereupon, waived; and an alias subpoena awarded. 3 Dall. 320.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] See same cause at 4 U.S. 1, 4 Dall. 1.[ New York v. Connecticut

Footnote 4 U.S. 6 (1799) ]

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)  4 U.S. 6 (Dall.)

The State of New York
v.
The State of Connecticut et al. *

August Term, 1799

AS the state of Connecticut did not appear, Hoffman moved that she should appear on the first day of next term, or that the plaintiff be then at liberty to proceed ex parte. 3 Dal. 335. But Lewis observed, that the rule required that a subpoena issuing in a suit in equity, should be served sixty days before the return; which had not been done in the present case. The first motion was, thereupon, waived; and an alias subpoena awarded. 3 Dall. 320.

Footnotes [Footnote *] See same cause at 4 U.S. 1, 4 Dall. 1.[ New York v. Connecticut

Footnote 4 U.S. 6 (1799) ]

Comments

Be the first to comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. * indicates required fields.

Top